Choosing to embrace freedom in Christ to seek God’s will, do his work better:
Dear sisters and brothers in Christ:
I wanted to share with you some of the details about an exciting decision to faithfully and bravely exercise our freedom in Christ that our Church Council made Sunday, July 11.
By a significant 7-2 majority, the council decided to begin a congregational discernment process to seek God’s will, believing that this would likely help to more effectively fulfill Jesus’ mandate of outreach and evangelism.
I believe this decision has great potential both to individually deepen our walk with Jesus (responding to his invitation in Matthew 11: 28: “Come to me, all who are weary and are carrying heavy burdens”) and to make more effective our collective evangelistic outreach (responding to his Great Commission in Matthew 28: 19: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations”).
We know, of course, about some churches where freedom in Christ is in short supply. Certain questions are forbidden and simply must not be asked. Questions like “Should women be allowed to become priests?” or “Can a divorced person serve as a deacon?” cannot be discussed fully and honestly.
But our Church Council resisted the ever-present temptation to take important questions off the table for everyone, lest someone be offended.
The Church Council decided that Stow Community United Church of Christ would initiate a congregational discernment process to seek God’s will for us about the “Open and Affirming” question — about how congregations should respond to gay and lesbian persons seeking to be welcomed to fully and safely participate in the life of the church.
Broadening the “welcome” question
In council’s deliberations, the question was very appropriately broadened to include looking at how, in practice, we can best welcome other groups that are unrepresented or underrepresented in the congregation. This would include prayerfully discussing how to welcome young families, students, single parents, disabled people, those with mobility issues, racial and ethnic minorities, immigrants etc.
What this really boils down to is praying, studying and discussing these questions over a period of months to try to discern God’s will for this congregation. This would then lead to a decision about whether or not the congregation wishes to take a position on any of these or related questions.
Understandably, some anxiety is always expected anytime any discussion begins that might alter the status quo. But the goal here is really to make things better for all.
I honestly can’t see much of a downside for Christians prayerfully seeking to discern God’s will for them. Yes, this anticipates an answer. And it anticipates being OK with an answer that we might not have anticipated. After all, we pray every Sunday that God’s “will be done on earth, as it is in heaven.” (Matthew 6:10, King James Version)
When God does show up, when his people pray, the results can be breathtakingly wonderful and redemptive to individuals, families and entire communities.
So there is no predetermined outcome to this prayerful and Spirit-led process. (And even if I wanted to, I couldn’t lead the congregation to a predetermined outcome because I won’t be here to conclude the discernment process.)
However, I believe we can we trust in faith that, if we truly seek God’s will, God will faithfully show up in our journey and guide us and answer us: “Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened to you.” (Matthew 7: 7, King James Version.)
No one forced to do anything, or believe anything
Nevertheless, no one will be forced to participate who does not want to.
The whole process will be surrounded with prayer and should be framed by Christian love, tolerance and respect for those participants who may advocate positions with which others may disagree.
Though consensus and collaboration is a goal, freedom of belief and conscience needs to be honored and respected. As Paul famously and correctly urged, “Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.” (Romans 14: 5, King James Version.)
The goal of this process is to discern God’s will about how we can best flesh out and correctly apply our Statement of Welcome. This also means broadening our understanding of how the Gospel of Jesus Christ applies to these questions for us in our unique situation now.
In practice, the discernment process is likely to involve a series of open meetings or prayer breakfasts over a number of months and may involve recommended reading or study materials.
I anticipate working with the Church Council to design a discernment process (maybe the word “journey” would be better) that will be a right fit for this congregation. This process will seek to engage and encourage the congregation itself to discover God’s will for us on these questions. I’ll be attending a 2-day training session on this in August.
It’s all about welcome. Another word for “welcome” is “evangelism.” Another is “outreach.” We almost can‘t have too much welcome, evangelism or outreach right now.
Background of council’s decision
The congregation unanimously adopted a Statement of Welcome Feb. 28, 2010, refocusing our attention and ministry to the surrounding community and committing the congregation to “seek and submit to God’s will as we partner with Jesus to invite in and bless those now outside the church.”
In practice, however, our congregation has had difficulty in recent months and years in actually bringing new people to membership in this church. We’ve continued to age and to decline in numbers and in ministry to the community.
In short, the status quo is simply not sustainable. Present trends are taking us where we don’t want to go. As JoAnn Hickey vividly summed it up to the council, “We’ve got to do something!”
Then, a few weeks back, the church received a telephone inquiry from a gay person in a committed, long-term relationship asking whether this congregation would be welcoming and affirming.
Though there appears to be no formal barrier in the congregation’s Constitution to membership of such persons, the mere lack of a formal barrier does not directly answer the caller’s question about “welcome” and “affirmation.” Nor does it answer important questions about our congregational culture and our understandings of Scripture, theology, biology, social science, Christian community and Christian practice related to this question.
The United Church of Christ’s General Synod XV in 1985 recommended, by a 98% majority, that UCC congregations “declare themselves open and affirming.”
Now, 25 years later, there is still no church in Stow that has positioned itself as welcoming and safe for gays and lesbians. There also does not seem to be much effective Christian outreach to minorities in Stow’s churches. And we certainly need to identify what is needed to effectively welcome young people and young families into our church.
The smart thing, and the right thing
This focus on expanding our congregational welcome is a smart thing to do from a church-growth perspective. It is also the right thing to do.
Jesus himself insists that we must welcome all those whom we might mistakenly look down on as “the least of these my brethren” (Matthew 25: 40, King James Version).
As we embark on this journey with God, into his will and his promises, we walk by faith, not by sight. Like Abraham and Sarah, we journey to a place of promise where we’ve never been before. They believed God’s promises: “Having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them.” (Hebrews 11: 13, King James Version).
We too need to embrace God’s promises, and journey with God in faith.
The heritage of this congregation — beginning in 1918 — is one of faithfully and bravely extending an authentic Christian welcome to all.
May our legacy — when viewed from 2018 and beyond — also be one of faithfully and bravely seeking God’s will about how best to extend the welcome of Christ to all — in a way that is authentically faithful to God’s will and to his work for this congregation, in this situation, at this moment, right now. Amen.
Fraternally, Bill Meyer